Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 9, Rule 13, Order 43, Rule 1 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Ex parte decree — Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 9, Rule 13, Order 43, Rule 1 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Ex parte decree — Setting-aside of — Filing of appeal as well petition under Order 9, Rule 13 — Applicability of bar under Explanation to Order 9, Rule 13 — Defendant filed petition for setting aside ex parte decree before trial Court alongwith application for condoning delay in filing that petition — Subsequently, defendant also filed an appeal against the ex parte decree alongwith delay condonation application — Mean while, trial Court allowed the delay condonation petition — Appeal as well as the delay condonation petition before appellate Court dismissed for default — Dismissal of petition under Order 9, Rule 13 by trial Court in view of bar under Explanation to Order 9, Rule 13 — Whether order of trial Court sustainable? — Yes — By virtue of Explanation, disposal of appeal on any ground whatever apart from its withdrawal constitute sufficient reason for bringing bar into operation. To get citation of this judgment email link of this post to advppc1@gmail.com
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13, Order 43, Rule 1 - Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - Ex parte decree
No comments:
Post a Comment