Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Service Law - appointment

BIMLA DEVI Vs STATE OF HP 30.09.2010
RV RAVEENDRAN & JM PANCHAL, JJ.)

Civil Appeal No. 8428 of 2010 [Aris­ing out of SLP © No.8030 of 2006].


Ser­vice Law — Appoint­ment — Dif­fer­ent Courses — (ii) One year National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Dress Mak­ing and one year National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Embroi­dery and Nee­dle Work — respon­dents resisted peti­tion on ground that fourth respon­dent was rec­om­mended for post by third respon­dent as it con­sid­ered that National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Cut­ting & Tai­lor­ing was equiv­a­lent to National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Dress Mak­ing and that fourth respon­dent had other req­ui­site qual­i­fi­ca­tions — It was also con­tended that train­ing in Cut­ting & Tai­lor­ing trade was vir­tu­ally same as train­ing in Dress Mak­ing trade — appel­lant has pro­duced before this Court syl­labus for Dress Mak­ing Trade course and syl­labus for Cut­ting & Sewing Trade course — She has also pro­duced min­i­mum qual­i­fi­ca­tions pre­scribed for admis­sion to Cut­ting & Tai­lor­ing course and min­i­mum qual­i­fi­ca­tions for Dress Mak­ing Trade course — These show that both Dress Mak­ing course and Cut­ting & Sewing course are one year courses, but entry qual­i­fi­ca­tion for two courses are dif­fer­ent — Fur­ther what is pro­duced before us is syl­labus for Cut­ting and Sewing trade course and not for Cut­ting & Tai­lor­ing trade course which has been con­sid­ered to be equiv­a­lent to Dress mak­ing trade course — It is pos­si­ble that hav­ing regard to job require­ments, Selec­tion Board pro­ceeded on basis that National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Cut­ting & Tai­lor­ing is equiv­a­lent to National Trade Cer­tifi­cate in Dress Making.



Service Law - appointment

No comments:

Post a Comment

Trial