Friday, July 12, 2013

Service Law - Approbate and reprobate

Satish Kumar Vs State of HP 19.06.2009 (unique­u­nique)
CWP(T) No. 7945/2008 (OA-2347/2001).

Hon’ble Mr. Jus­tice Rajiv Sharma, J.

2010 LabIC (NOC) 100


Ser­vice Law — Appro­bate and repro­bate — Posts of Craft Instruc­tor (Instru­ment Mechanic) — Selec­tion Com­mit­tee after tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the knowl­edge of the sub­ject, gen­eral knowl­edge and aware­ness of the duties of Craft Instruc­tor (Instru­ment Mechanic), had rec­om­mended the name of respon­dent No. 4 — Once peti­tioner had appeared in the inter­view, he can­not assail the selec­tion process — peti­tioner is estopped from chal­leng­ing the selec­tion process — the peti­tioner has not been found suit­able by the Selec­tion Com­mit­tee — peti­tioner has not alleged any infrac­tion of rules while con­sti­tut­ing the Selec­tion Com­mit­tee nor has lev­elled any malafides against the mem­bers of the Com­mit­tee — peti­tion dismissed



Service Law - Approbate and reprobate

No comments:

Post a Comment

Trial